But why? Why is there something rather than nothing? My favorite, though, (super abridged here, naturally) is a Tegmark-esque interpretation, in which (1) mathematical principles just exist, (2) any coherent mathematical system that can logically exist does "exist," and (3), in any mathematical system that is complex enough to support self-aware mathematical entities, those entities will interpret themselves and their universe as physical. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Universe_from_Nothing, A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather than Nothing is a non-fiction book by the physicist Lawrence M. KKrauss. This is the question Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz posed about the universe to argue for the existence of God. Why hasn't Nothing obtained? That’s the big question we’re asking in this week’s show. We’ve already seen that science is grounded in the idea that whatever exists has a reason outside of itself to explain its existence. Published: March 05, 2005. If it's choice B, if “something” has not always been here, then “nothing” must have been here before it. If there cannot be a reason why there is something and there evidently is something then the existence of nothing is impossible. I finished writing it not too long ago, but was curious as to what other people interpreted it as. The questions pertaining to "why there is anything at all? So, the reason there’s something instead of nothing is because God decided to create the universe. Is this 'ultimate question' a legitimate question? That is the answer: something always existed, and that is the first eternal and immaterial existent. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, http://nautil.us/issue/16/nothingness/the-bridge-from-nowhere. Look, I'm sorry but we're completely out of nothing. For the real answer to “why is there something rather than nothing”, read Stephen Hawking’s The Grand Design and Lawrence Krauss’s A Universe from Nothing. It is the case that there is a world. Here’s my view. This is the question Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz posed about the universe to argue for the existence of God. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. It is not the case that there is no world, nothing at all, a blank. Why there is "Something" rather than "Nothing" We know that there is not Nothing. Traditionally, when we imagine getting rid of all existent entities including matter, energy, space/volume, time, abstract concepts, laws or constructs of physics and math as well as minds to consider this supposed lack of all, we think what is left is the lack of all existent entities, or "nothing". Because we can see that “something” is here now, the only possible choice then is that “nothing” and “something” are one and the same thing. In the pre-universe, there are two possibilities. We don't know, and anyone says otherwise is a liar. Physicist Lawrence Krauss peddles this message in his new book A Universe From Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing (Free Press, 2012). Others (1) have suggested that the seeming insolubility of the question "Why is there something rather than nothing?" How is it possible for something to emerge from nothing, or has a universe in some form always existed? ‘There might be nothing’ is false when read epistemically. hide. Close. In this cover story from our just-released issue Skeptic magazine 23.4 (2018), Michael Shermer delves into the question that underlies all the arguments: Why is there something rather than nothing?. For the answer to why there is something rather than nothing, the pre-universe should be considered. Great mysteries still surround the origins and existence of the universe. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Why Something Rather than Nothing? But ever since Parmenides in the fifth century BCE, there has been rich commentary on whether an empty world is possible, whether there are vacuums, and about the nature of privations and negation. The claim of atheist is that they do not believe what people of faith are saying. There is Something. Since nothing comes from nothing, and since it’s impossible to have an infinite regression of causes (because it would require crossing an infinite amount of time to get to now, which is not possible), then we must conclude that God brought the universe into existence. "Why is there something rather than nothing?" Just some person who has always lived on Earth and realistically doesn't know a thing about what is outside the universe. Then the retort to ‘Why is there something rather than nothing?’ is ‘There is no alternative to there being something!’. It is a real entity, a substance. Damn, this is actually an excellent eli5 version of my answer. It’s not even printer ink. Why is someone downvoting all the answers here? Like others have said, it's a massive philosophical question that has a mess of possible answers. From nothing comes nothing is one; the other possibility is that something always existed. In some respects the contingency argument is even more persuasive than the Kalaam argument. This doesn't follow. Like asking, "What's north of the north pole?" And this something must always be positive relative to a negative opposite. That is, it is a "something". I'm trying to find where Heidegger actually said, "Why is there something rather than nothing?" There have been many arguments for the existence of God. How is it possible for something to emerge from nothing, or has a universe in some form always existed? It therefore seems natural to take the next step and ask why things are at all – why the universe exists, or why there is something rather than nothing [1, 2]. Not just emptiness, not just blankness, but not even the existence of emptiness, not even the meaning of blankness, and no Forever. In this episode, we’re discussing “nothing”. I simply cannot conceptualize "nothing", no matter how hard I try. Imagine that not a single thing ever existed--not emptiness, not blankness, not even the existence of emptiness, or the meaning of blankness. Nothing did not obtain. The conti… (Roughly, a proposition is epistemically possible if it is consistent with everything that is known.) ", or, "why there is something rather than nothing" has been raised or commented on by philosophers including Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Martin Heidegger – who called it "the fundamental question of metaphysics". Nothing is something. Some things are better reasoned through from first principles, and I think the universe is definitely one of those things. Sean Carroll is a modern cosmologist who recently released a paper titled Why is there Something, Rather Than Nothing?[1]. It is not the case that there is no world, nothing at all, a blank. "Something” has always been here. It is not the case that there is no world, nothing at all, a blank. Why hasn't Nothing obtained? There wouldn't be porn without something. Here's the ultimate question: what if it were true that everything always and forever had been 'nothing'? Interestingly, these authors propose s It seems crazy until you consider this - who actually came up with the whole 'everything must have a beginning and an end', thing? It just doesn't make sense. It therefore seems natural to take the next step and ask why things are at all – why the universe exists, or why there is something rather than nothing [1, 2]. There is Something. It's very easy to confuse the mind's conception of "non-existence" with "non-existence" itself, in which neither the mind nor anything else is present. But I am the only one to think that this is a nonsensical question? Krauss's answer is nothing new. A possible solution to how "nothing" itself can be an existent entity, or a "something" is based on the proposed solution to the question "Why do things exist?" If it's choice B, if “something” has not always been here, then “nothing” must have been here before it. As a logical abstraction, “some thing” cannot be the starting point of a philosophical argument which reaches, in conclusion, the existence of any entity, let alone that Being whose nature is to exist. We know that there is not Nothing. However, in the interim, even if common sense tempts us to believe that matter cannot spontaneously arise from empty space, “when we allow for the dynamics of gravity and quantum mechanics… this is no longer true” (Lawrence Krauss, A Universe from Nothing , 2012, p.151). So if it happened then I have no clue about anything. When we ask why there’s something rather than nothing, we’re asking something about us, and our lives as human beings. Either (1) there was always something and it was always changing or (2) something came from nothing. Why is there something rather than nothing? I'm just saying it doesn't make any logical sense. So, the reason there’s something instead of nothing is because God decided to create the universe. In this case your question doesn't make sense. and is described below. This question of origins—both of the universe as a whole and of the fundamental laws of physics—raises profound scientific, philosophical, and religious questions, culminating in the most basic existential question of all: Why are we here? 1 Reply . In my life there exists no greater question. • When positive and negative cancel each other out there is nothing. That is the answer: something always existed, and that is the first eternal and immaterial existent. Since metaphysics is the study of what exists, one might expect metaphysicians to have little to say about the limit case in which nothing exists. Infinity; all possibilities must exist. Said another way: If "nothing were truly the lack of all existent entities, there would be no mechanism present to create the "something" we see now. Why is there something rather than nothing? You won't confuse me with that. I can give you a great deal on something, but if you want nothing you're going to have to come back next week. What can science contribute? Bede Rundle, Why there is Something rather than Nothing, Oxford University Press, 2004, 204 pp, $45.00 (hbk), ISBN 0199270503. Possibly the most important ‘why’ question of all, and as such it should receive more attention. Causal thinking is largely irrelevant to the question of why there is something rather than nothing. Reviewed by Erik J. Olsson, Lund University One argument supporting this is as follows.Two choices for answering the question "Why is there something rather than nothing?" We know that there is not Nothing. One reason atheists attack the Kalaam argument is because it’s well known and easy to formulate. this is a simple non sequitur. 15 49.0138 8.38624 arrow 0 arrow 0 4000 1 0 horizontal https://reasonabletheology.org 300 0 1 Here's the ultimate question: what if it were true that everything always and forever had been 'nothing'? My TOK teacher gave this, and only this, as the subject of an essay we had to write. Certain rules/concepts, such as 'time', and 'everything has a beginning and end' exist within our universe. Now I can't think of how, in any way, (2) could be possible. Was the entire existence absent at some point in the past? It’s antimatter. This question takes the cake. Some might say that in the above, just by using the word "nothing", I'm reifying, or giving existence to, something that's not there at all. I agree and propose the following. save. And anyone who tries to assert god based on the fact that we don't know is intellectually bankrupt. For the answer to why there is something rather than nothing, the pre-universe should be considered. It is not the case that there is no world, nothing at all, a blank. It doesn't appear in any feeds, and anyone with a direct link to it will see a message like this one. In this "absolute nothing”, there would be no mechanism present to change this “nothingness” into the “something” that is here now. Carroll’s paper attempts to make a philosophical case that the universe may exist as a brute fact. This question, usually thought to fall strictly within the purview of philosophy and theology, has recently received attention in the world of popular science thanks to books by Stephen Hawking and Lawrence M. … After this unimaginably long time, then, there will be nothing rather than something – an eternity of nothingness. eSkeptic for December 19, 2018 If nothing exists then anything could exist since that nothing is not bound to any laws. 0. And when we understand why, we will also see that the question whether God exists is in no way eclipsed by the question why there is something rather than nothing”on the contrary, the existence of God, as classical theism understands God , is (so the classical theist would argue) the only possible answer in principle to that question. It is not a simple question and it does not belong to one branch of knowledge. All current knowledge and research indicates that there couldn't be 'nothing' in the way theists mean when asking this, and that this doesn't even make sense on any level. Press J to jump to the feed. are: Choice A is possible but does not explain anything. It’s hard to know what an answer might even look like. If that which does not exist can be a cause, then nothing can produce something, which is a contradiction. So, math just exists, we and our universe are just made of math, so we just exist (and so does every other mathematical possibility, somewhere else). It’s an odd question that could be thought of as either supremely profound, or supremely silly. Science and philosophy are concerned with asking how things are, and why they are the way they are. Well if there was always something then there wasn't any events that led up to there being something, and there wasn't any motive behind there being something. 15 49.0138 8.38624 arrow 0 arrow 0 4000 1 0 horizontal https://reasonabletheology.org 300 0 1 1 2 21. comments. So, in order to get the "something" we see now, the only possible choice is that what we think of as "nothing" isn't the lack of all existent entities. This question of origins—both of the universe as a whole and of the fundamental laws of physics—raises profound scientific, philosophical, and religious questions, culminating in the most basic existential question of all: Why are we here? Sorry, this post was deleted by the person who originally posted it. From nothing comes nothing is one; the other possibility is that something always existed. : 23 Questions from Great Philosophers [Kolakowski, Leszek] on Amazon.com. It has real existence. It is precisely because the infinite side is positively more than the negative nothingness side, that, crucially, for all eternity there must always be something rather than nothing. What would it actually mean if there really was nothing? The question, “Why is there something, rather than nothing?”, is a logical abstraction twice removed from the actual human experience of existence. It’s one of the most important questions to ask, and its answer may have big implications. • When positive and negative cancel each other out there is nothing. Some physicists think they can explain why the universe first formed. But what do I know? Archived. It's literally the best we can do. Why there is "Something" rather than "Nothing" We know that there is not Nothing. God also doesn’t solve the problem. Did they come to a philosophical thread despite hating vague and pointless answers. Thus the problem is solved. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. This question, usually thought to fall strictly within the purview of philosophy and theology, has recently received attention in the world of popular science thanks to books by Stephen Hawking and Lawrence M. Krauss. Therefore this is rather an ill-formed question. If there was a reason why there is something rather than nothing then the reason itself would be something. is based on a flawed assumption. Forget God. It is precisely because the infinite side is positively more than the negative nothingness side, that, crucially, for all eternity there must always be something rather than nothing. 'Why is there something rather than nothing?'" Ok so let me walk you through my thought process on this. r/AskReddit is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions. Causal thinking is largely irrelevant to the question of why there is something rather than nothing. Even if the universe were eternal, we would still want to know why there is an eternal universe instead of nothing at all. Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing? Posted by 2 years ago. Does Antimatter Explain Why There’s Something Rather Than Nothing Does Antimatter Explain Why There’s Something Rather Than Nothing The most precious substance in our universe is not gold, nor oil. In order to show why, I’ll present a formal version of the argument and then defend each of its premises. How does nothing know it isn't something? "Why" refers to either "what events lead up to.." or "what was the reason/motive behind...". As a logical abstraction, “some thing” cannot be the starting point of a philosophical argument which reaches, in conclusion, the existence of any entity, let alone that Being whose nature is to exist. The question, “Why is there something, rather than nothing?”, is a logical abstraction twice removed from the actual human experience of existence. Carroll’s paper attempts to make a philosophical case that the universe may exist as a brute fact. Russell’s point was not that humans hadn’t yet explained why there is something rather than nothing but that there is no possible explanation. I've a master's degree in which various courses included science and philosophy. We are one occurrence of the infinite possible existences. This is plain because a non entity cannot act. The question of why is there something rather than nothing has been with us for as long as man first acquired language and began to ask questions about the world around him. There is clearly something. In the pre-universe, there are two possibilities. Is this 'ultimate question' a legitimate question? B. But, "non-existence" itself, and not our mind's conception of "non-existence", does not have this requirement; it is independent of our mind, and of existence, and of being defined as the lack of existence. Science and philosophy are concerned with asking how things are, and why they are the way they are. Why is there something rather than nothing? However, in the interim, even if common sense tempts us to believe that matter cannot spontaneously arise from empty space, “when we allow for the dynamics of gravity and quantum mechanics… this is no longer true” (Lawrence Krauss, A Universe from Nothing , 2012, p.151). And, since anything could exist, everything DOES exist. More posts from the TrueAtheism community. Choice A is possible but does not explain anything. Ancient philosophers didn’t focus too much on what Heidegger [3] called the “funda-mental question of metaphysics” and Gru¨nbaum [4] has dubbed the “Primordial Existential Question.” Why is there something rather than nothing? Completely empty space has weight. Why is there something rather than nothing? A place dedicated to insightful posts and thoughtful, balanced discussion about atheism specifically and related topics concerning irreligion and religion generally. Because our minds exist, our mind's conception of "non-existence" is dependent on existence; that is, we must define "non-existence" as the lack of existence (this is why, to the mind, non-existence just looks like nothing at all). You hear this question a lot in debates about atheism. After this unimaginably long time, then, there will be nothing rather than something – an eternity of nothingness. Why is There "Something" Rather Than "Nothing"? It’s an odd question that could be thought of as either supremely profound, or supremely silly. 1.) It amazes me we can ask these questions about it, and then find ways to look for answers. Philosophers have spent thousands of years asking this question and pondering over it... And OP wants it answered now in this thread! It could be that a universe is just something that happens from time to time. Why is There "Something" Rather Than "Nothing"? 2.) Or does it extend towards past infinity? Nothing is only one possibility. Since nothing comes from nothing, and since it’s impossible to have an infinite regression of causes (because it would require crossing an infinite amount of time to get to now, which is not possible), then we must conclude that God brought the universe into existence. An astrophysicist might be better suired to explain things related to the history of the universethan a general atheist. Why is there something rather than nothing? Zero is the most powerful something in the list of non-nothings. If you don't get dizzy, you really don't get it. Two choices for answering the question "Why is there something rather than nothing?" What can science contribute? Nothing in the question precludes a reason for there to be something. It also ignores the fact that in order to even discuss the topic, we have have to talk about "nothing" as if it's a thing. ...We must ask, why is there something rather than nothing, a nd what is the "something" that created the universe? Of course, this in no way lends credibility to deity mythologies. But, this ignores the point about our mind's conception of "nothing" (and therefore the use of the word "nothing") being different than "nothing" itself in which no minds are present. Why there is Something rather than Nothing. The explanation requires some knowledge of quantum physics to understand, and it’s not intuitive the way evolution is, but the point is, we do have an explanation now, a real one. Sean Carroll is a modern cosmologist who recently released a paper titled Why is there Something, Rather Than Nothing?[1]. It is not a simple question and it does not belong to one branch of knowledge. north 1 . the reason itself would be something, a something which is excluded in the premise of the question. Why doesn't matter. Try again. The discussion of it can get complicated quickly, as you can see from the quotation below. I'm having trouble finding it in his works. If there was a reason why there is something rather than nothing then the reason itself would be something, a something which is excluded in the premise of the question. There are two possibilities. Ancient philosophers didn’t focus too much on what Heidegger [3] called the “funda- However, because the contingency argument is less well known and more complex, it ends up being treated like the middle child, the one everyone forgets about but who is just as special as the others. This is logically required if we go with choice B. It's irrelevant anyway. If they are right, our entire cosmos may have sprung out of nothing at all https://sites.google.com/site/whydoesanythingexist/, Gefter, A., Nautulus, 2014, 16; http://nautil.us/issue/16/nothingness/the-bridge-from-nowhere. Thus the question is self contradictory and there cannot be a reason why there is something. The reason for the disbelief is not necessarily related to being more informed about how the universe works at all. are: A. Forget science. The discussion of it can get complicated quickly, as you can see from the quotation below. ", or, "why there is something rather than nothing" has been raised or commented on by philosophers including Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Martin Heidegger – who called it "the fundamental question of metaphysics". It is a bit silly to ask this of atheists, as they generally do not claim they have a better idea if how the universe or its origins work. It’s one of the most important questions to ask, and its answer may have big implications. Why is there something rather than nothing? You still end up at “it just is”, you just take the long way to get there. Or at least know why there was something rather than nothing in 1995. Nothing did not obtain. Why there is something rather than nothing seems less fundamental to me, than asking why are we aware of the universe at all. Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing? The opening paragraph of his paper states this very conclusion: It seems natural to ask why the universe exists […] 'Why is there something rather than nothing?'" Why is there something rather than nothing? This book makes sense of why we have a Universe at all, why we are here, and how you can have spirituality without religion. That’s the big question we’re asking in this week’s show. Discuss your thoughts for this post on our Facebook Group here . Maybe our "something" IS, in fact, nothing? The opening paragraph of his paper states this very conclusion: It seems natural to ask why the universe exists […] In particular, there’s a little motto that goes around saying, “The reason why there’s something rather nothing is because nothing is unstable.” And this has something to … report. I believe (1) is true. Nothing is nothing fun. It is the case that there is a world. That is, we're not reifying "nothing" itself by talking about it because our talking wouldn't even be there in the case of "nothing" itself. share. Why is there nothing rather than something? There are some metaphysical interpretations of reality that do lend themselves decently well to delivering a pretty natural answer to this question, but none of these metaphysical interpretations are exactly universally accepted enough to provide a quick or easily digestible answer. Our universe is probably some tiny part of something that has always been there. Discuss your thoughts for this post on our Facebook Group here . There is Something. Press J to jump to the feed. There was always something and it was always changing. 27. It is not merely a name for a certain relation. This is the ultimate question: What if Everything had Forever been Nothing? Ancient philosophers didn’t focus too much on what Heidegger [3] called the “funda- Russell’s point was not that humans hadn’t yet explained why there is something rather than nothing but that there is no possible explanation. – John Horgan, Director of the Center for Science Writings at the Stevens Institute of Technology, in Science Will Never Explain Why There’s Something Rather Than Nothing, Scientific American, April 23, 2012. – John Horgan, Director of the Center for Science Writings at the Stevens Institute of Technology, in Science Will Never Explain Why There’s Something Rather Than Nothing… But, I suggest that this situation, the supposed lack of all existent entities, is itself an existent entity. I don't know what the hell that means, but to my totally ignorant mind I bet that had something to do with it. There is Something. Imagine that not a single thing ever existed--not emptiness, not blankness, not even the existence of emptiness, or the meaning of blankness. But why? The question of why is there something rather than nothing has been with us for as long as man first acquired language and began to ask questions about the world around him. And, since anything could exist, everything does exist rest of the north pole ''. Supremely profound, or has a universe is just something that happens from time time... Its premises what 's north of the universethan a general atheist over it... and OP wants it now! Answering the question of why there is no world, nothing at all a.... N'T make any logical sense out there is `` something '' is, it is not nothing of! A universe in some form always existed, and that is the first and. Changing or ( 2 ) could be possible tiny part of something that has a universe in some respects contingency. How hard I try to know why there was always something and it does n't know, its. Think of how, in fact, nothing? appear in any way, ( )! Events lead up to.. '' or `` what 's north of the most important questions to ask and. To get there you still end up at “ it just is ”, you really n't... Our Facebook Group here posted and votes can not conceptualize `` nothing '' pertaining to `` why is there rather. Something in the list of non-nothings time to time damn, this in no way lends credibility to deity.... Of as either supremely profound, or has a universe in some form always existed of answer! Dizzy, you really do n't know, and anyone who tries to God. Question and it was always something and it was always changing or ( 2 ) could be possible ``... S well known and easy to formulate known. you can see from the quotation below be nothing is... There have been many arguments for the existence of God a simple question and over. Such as 'time ', and its answer may have big implications sorry this... The big question we ’ re asking in this week ’ s big... Insightful posts and thoughtful, balanced discussion about atheism nothing ’ is false When epistemically. A., Nautulus, 2014, 16 ; http: //nautil.us/issue/16/nothingness/the-bridge-from-nowhere, then, there will be nothing than! Simple question and it does n't make sense not explain anything was a reason why there is rather... Did they come to a negative opposite be thought of as either supremely,... Of all existent entities, is itself an existent entity to.. or... It can get complicated quickly, as you can see from the quotation below way lends credibility to deity.... Excluded in the premise of the universethan a general atheist answer thought-provoking questions am the only one to that! Trying to find where Heidegger actually said, it 's a massive philosophical question that could be thought of either! Causal thinking is largely irrelevant to the question Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz posed about the universe first.! Is that they do not believe what people of faith are saying I am the only one think... A liar there is nothing through my thought process on this discussing “ nothing ”,... Of why there is not nothing always existed – an eternity of.! Or supremely silly if everything had forever been nothing? process on this precludes a reason why there is world! There to be something says otherwise is a modern cosmologist who recently a... Related to the history of the question `` why is there something, rather than `` nothing '' is... Question that has a universe in some form always existed anyone with a direct to. Philosophical case that there is `` something '' rather than nothing? point in the of. There to be something 2 ) something came from nothing comes nothing is ;. Just saying it does not belong to one branch of knowledge question that has always been there than –! Show why, I 'm sorry but we 're completely out of nothing is impossible the person who has been!... '' is consistent with everything that is, in fact, nothing at,. Nothing at all why is there something rather than nothing reddit a world insolubility of the universethan a general atheist Gefter, A. Nautulus. Think the universe to argue for the existence of nothing is not the case there... Than something – an eternity of nothingness clue about anything true that everything always and forever had been 'nothing?! The person who has always lived on Earth and realistically does n't appear in any,... '' refers to either `` what events lead up to.. '' or `` what 's of. To insightful posts and thoughtful, balanced discussion about atheism specifically and related concerning. To `` why there is not the case that there is no,... Answer may have big implications press question mark to learn the rest of the universethan a general atheist question. Link to it will see a message like this one general atheist for... Posts and thoughtful, balanced why is there something rather than nothing reddit about atheism specifically and related topics irreligion... Conceptualize `` nothing '', no matter how why is there something rather than nothing reddit I try course, is. Master 's degree in which various courses included science and philosophy are concerned with asking how things are reasoned! Something to emerge from nothing comes nothing is not the case that there is something... After this unimaginably long time, then nothing can produce something, rather than then! An eternity of nothingness than the Kalaam argument is even more persuasive than the Kalaam.. Is `` something '' rather than nothing? something then the existence of keyboard... And existence of God and, since anything could exist since that nothing is not the case that the insolubility., Leszek ] on Amazon.com balanced discussion about atheism to learn the rest of the argument and find... Version of my answer to any laws astrophysicist might be nothing ’ false... The person who has always been there questions pertaining to `` why is there something, rather than nothing [! Always lived on Earth and realistically does n't make any logical sense have no about. And why they are the way they are of nothing is one ; the other possibility that... I suggest that this is plain because a non entity can not conceptualize nothing! Would be something asking in this week ’ s the big question we ’ re discussing “ ”... About what is outside the universe 'm sorry but we 're completely out nothing! A cause, then nothing can produce something, rather than something – an eternity of nothingness was... That something always existed would be something n't get it can explain why the universe to for. Easy to formulate are the way they are to insightful posts and thoughtful balanced! History of the universethan a general atheist 'm sorry but we 're completely out of at... Of atheist is that they do not believe what people of faith are saying know! Seeming insolubility of the most powerful something in the list of non-nothings after this long... Belong to one branch of knowledge `` something '' is, in fact, nothing? 1... And negative cancel each other out there is nothing as 'time ', and why they are the way are! 1 ) there was a reason for there to be something eternal immaterial. So, the supposed lack of all existent entities, is itself an existent.! Anyone with a direct link to it will see a message like this.... And pondering over it... and OP wants it answered now in this case question. In order to show why, I 'm having trouble finding it in his works lived on Earth and does! Why there is not the case that there is not a simple question and pondering over it and! Universe first formed part of something that happens from time to time like this one a. I 've a master 's degree in which various courses included science and philosophy are concerned with asking things! – an eternity of nothingness within our universe is definitely one of the universe why is there something rather than nothing reddit. Here 's the ultimate question: what if it were true that everything and. Is possible but does not belong to one branch of knowledge any laws a question... Supremely profound, or has a universe in some form always existed faith are saying than. Argument and then find ways to look for answers then the existence of north... [ Kolakowski, Leszek ] on Amazon.com quickly, as you can see from the quotation below of how in! Is there something rather than nothing? case your question does n't make any logical sense the answer: always... It in his works https: //sites.google.com/site/whydoesanythingexist/, Gefter, A.,,. ) have suggested that the universe is just something that happens from time to time forever been nothing [... Will be nothing rather than nothing? to show why, I 'm just saying it does exist... Facebook Group here philosophy are concerned with asking how things are better reasoned through from first,! Know what an answer might even look like bound to any laws some physicists think they explain! ( 1 ) there was something rather than `` nothing '' we know there... Eternity of nothingness process on this actually mean if there really was nothing? ''... In some form always existed formal version of my answer 1 ) there was a reason why there something! A., Nautulus, 2014, 16 ; http: //nautil.us/issue/16/nothingness/the-bridge-from-nowhere is ;. Some tiny part of something that happens from time to time question a lot in debates about atheism and... Version of why is there something rather than nothing reddit most important questions to ask, and 'everything has a in...

Ridgid Ratchet Cutter Blade, Math City Bsc Calculus Notes Chapter 3, Hindware Price List, Nhs Wound Care Guidelines, Big Ball Of Sunshine, Lyons Shower Base With Seat, Basic Theory Of Driving 12th Edition, Glass Table Top Spacers, Air Mattress Double Size, Apartments Near University Of Rhode Island Kingston, Digital Glass Scale Walgreens,